Request cloud security

Typical scope

  • Accounts / subscriptions
  • IAM roles and keys
  • Network and exposure
  • Logging and monitoring
  • Baseline and guardrails

Security Service

Kubernetes Security Review

The Kubernetes security review assesses cluster architecture, RBAC, networks, workload hardening, and supply chain risks. The outcome is a prioritized remediation plan, not just scan output.

Cluster architecture

Control plane, node pools, network design.

RBAC & workloads

Service accounts, permissions, pod security.

Prioritized fixes

Risk backlog with owners and deadlines.

Important boundary:

A review does not replace continuous hardening. Without ownership and operational processes, findings stay open and risks reappear.


Quick overview

What the review is
  • Deep assessment, not an automated scan.
  • Focus on RBAC, networks, workloads, and supply chain.
  • Output is a prioritized remediation plan.
What you should expect
  • clear risks per cluster and namespace
  • fix priorities based on exploitability
  • guardrails for CI/CD and deployments
  • actionable guidance for platform teams

Fits if you …

  • run Kubernetes in production.
  • have multiple teams deploying workloads.
  • need clarity on RBAC and pod security.
  • want actionable fixes, not just findings.

Not a fit if …

  • you cannot access clusters and configurations.
  • you only want a shallow scan.
  • no resources exist for remediation and operations.

Review vs. Kubernetes pentest vs. CSPM

Security review

deep config review for RBAC and operations.

Kubernetes pentest

attack-path validation and exploit evidence.

CSPM

tool signals without operational fix planning.

Decision

Review for operations and guardrails, pentest for attack paths, CSPM for continuous signals.


Typical use cases

Platform & operations
  • Clusters grow without RBAC and network policy standards.
  • Namespace and service account sprawl.
  • Missing guardrails in CI/CD and deployments.
Risk & compliance
  • Production workloads handling sensitive data.
  • Audits demand proof of RBAC and isolation.

Process & methodology

1) Scope & preparation

Clusters, namespaces, workloads, CI/CD, logging.

2) Review & risk

RBAC, network policies, pod security, supply chain.

3) Actions & tracking

Fix priorities, guardrails, implementation.

Scope & preparation

  • Capture cluster type, versions, and network model.
  • Define namespaces, workloads, and critical services.
  • Align CI/CD, image registries, and supply chain flow.
  • Agree on logging and runtime monitoring.

Execution

  • Review RBAC, service accounts, and secrets for least privilege.
  • Validate network policies, ingress, and exposure.
  • Check pod security, admission controls, and runtime policies.
  • Prioritize findings into a remediation backlog.
Operational reality

Without ownership and CI/CD standards, risks return quickly. Guardrails must be embedded into deployments and pipelines.

Deliverables

  • Prioritized findings with owners and deadlines.
  • Guardrail catalog for RBAC, network policies, and pod security.
  • Hardening roadmap and quick wins.
  • Evidence for coverage and exceptions.

Provider selection criteria

Quality & method
  • Experience with Kubernetes operations and CI/CD.
  • Clear criteria for RBAC and network policies.
  • Defensible risk prioritization.
Technology & operations
  • Access to clusters, IaC, and logs.
  • Integration with ticketing and change processes.
  • Measurable KPIs and reporting cadence.

Next steps

  1. Inventory clusters and critical workloads.
  2. Define RBAC, network policy, and pod security baselines.
  3. Prioritize and fix top risks.
  4. Embed guardrails in CI/CD and deployments.

If you are unsure, describe your situation briefly.

Request cloud security